Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (246632)	4/20/2008 4:17:35 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793809

This is exactly why innocents must be protected. The root of the problem here are men and women should not be made to suffer for being abused. * * *

To: Neeka who wrote (246632)	4/20/2008 10:02:18 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793809

It would be interesting to know if the women EVER had a say in whatever the tenants of the 'religion' they are following.... What made them go with it in the first place? Fear? Dumb? Duty to something, heaven only knows what? How did they get trapped in such an arrangement? I can see this kind of thinking in maybe the Middle East, where such things have happened over the centuries. But this isn't a ME religion. It is a break off of a religion started in THIS country.... If I knew that the women had a choice to stay and follow their dictates, or to leave if they didn't want to stay, I'd feel better about the whole thing. If they knew, and chose to stay anyway, then the women are as guilty as the men. But if not, they need protection. Are they brainwashed as Patty Hurst was? The children who came after the women stayed are innocent, and had no choice.