SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (26417)4/21/2008 11:33:41 AM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224706
 
First exploratory question regarding BO's loyalties--what are the sources of the multi-millions flowing into his campaign coffers?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (26417)4/21/2008 11:37:10 AM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224706
 
We've never had in a previous presidential campaign a candidate with long-standing close ties to radical anti-Americans.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (26417)4/21/2008 12:17:44 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224706
 
DEMOCRAT HARD AT WORK BEING DISLOYAL

“Was there any part of the globe, from the Caribbean to the Middle East, from Haiti to North Korea to the Balkans, where Jimmy Carter didn’t cozy up to dictators? Wherever he goes, tyrants smile. The long, dispiriting trail of former President Carter’s overseas travels has been marked by one diplomatic disaster after another. As for Jimmy Carter’s role as a monitor of free-and-fair elections, the low point must have come when he gave his blessings to Robert Mugabe’s takeover in Zimbabwe. Naturally, utter disaster followed. It hasn’t ceased there since. And now Mr. Carter is at it again, [paying] court to just about the bloodiest terrorist leader in the Middle East, which is no mean distinction in those violent parts. He [lent] his ex-presidential presence to terrorist chieftain Khaled Meshaal, who as head of Hamas hides out in Damascus under Syrian aegis. (Let others die for the cause in Gaza; its leader is quite comfortable, thank you.) The only proper greeting for someone like Mr. Meshaal would be, ‘You’re under arrest.’ Instead, saw Jimmy Carter pay his usual homage to those who champion violence. He calls this peace-seeking. Which raises the question, if this is promoting peace, what would encouraging violence be?” —Paul Greenberg