Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (27917)	4/21/2008 2:12:12 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

" If its all about the sex of the person does that mean a woman can't abort a male fetus?" The day that fetus is raised in an artificial womb it does!

To: TimF who wrote (27917)	4/22/2008 11:59:51 PM
From: RMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Tim...if you REALLY want to stretch the boundaries on the argument, then shouldn't we consider the children that women DON'T have, regardless of abortion?? Every woman of normal health and productivity is probably capable of having 38 or so children. Should we FORCE women to have all of those 38 children, or at least FORCE them to have their eggs removed so those children can at least be born by surrogates? IF a woman doesn't allow those FUTURE "potential" humans to be born, isn't she like KILLING a lot of "possible" human beings?