Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (61322)	4/24/2008 7:21:51 AM
From: Bridge Player	Respond to of 542153

Given the 118-0 and 37-2 vote margins that Slacker has already pointed out, it might be more appropriate to simply acknowledge that you posted an erroneous statement. The Hillary gambit that you were too under fire is not becoming.

To: Katelew who wrote (61322)	4/24/2008 7:48:28 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542153

I guess my last post containing quotes didnt convince you that the Democratic efforts to move the date back were insincere. Here is a video of the Democratic leader of the House proposing the amendment to move the date to February. blogs.tampabay.com Honestly, I dont see how anybody can view that video and still believe that they were really trying to move the date back. Remember, the original bill was sponsered by a Democrat and moved through a Committee unanimously. It was only after the DNC started threatening to remove the delegates that the Florida Democrats came up with this gesture to try and give them cover. The DNC saw right through the ruse and decided to remove the delegates back in August. Slacker