Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (380066)	4/24/2008 11:35:50 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 1578660

for me it was the honesty and integrity. Clinton have been so duplicitous. The double talk about wright hurt a lot. I still say if i belonged to a church whose pastor said these thing, i would have challenged him and then quit if necessary. I understand african american history so i demand context for remarks here but even with context, it certainly warranted a apat on obamas part. And back to the clintons the worry about integrity is sort of offset now by perceived strength. I can now vote for a tough gal dem in the general election who reminds me more of maggie thatcher than past candidates. I dont need mccains reactionary approach to the war in iraq and vietnam to get the toughness we need in todays world. If obama cant argue with his pastor and is hesitant to get tough with hillary, Krushchev will eat him up worse than he ate up JFK back in 61-62.