Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: blazenzim who wrote (33814)	4/24/2008 11:35:37 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 217567

That did it.

To: blazenzim who wrote (33814)	4/24/2008 1:32:37 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 217567

LMAO #23

To: blazenzim who wrote (33814)	4/24/2008 9:28:12 PM
From: Dr. Voodoo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217567

The chuckle value on this alone was enough to make me #36... Dood, you should consider a career in politics. Wait... Dubya is that you?? I know those approval ratings are down and all, but really... don't you have some more pensions to ruin or something?

To: blazenzim who wrote (33814)	4/24/2008 9:29:23 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217567

hello zim, i see you have done the japanese thing ;0) come on, do not be melodramatic and stop with the whining cry baby chicken poo fits; very unbecoming; very much a spoiled mousy cat thing. you are not a spoiled mousy cat, are you? it is and will be ok to come back in, we have all sorts here, in all shapes, colours, creed, etc etc, and yes, even ... well, never mind, i will refrain and stay civil; just sign up for another free account if you are unable to commit to some loose change flow. and come back in, take it as it should be taken ... mirthfully. some of your alleged trades were based on true but obvious ideas, whether of your own or whatever, were actually pretty good, of merit, for the moment, certainly saves time on reading the news and come up with a trade, and so may be useful; whether one could put true capital to work in that fashion, or just throw a few chips on the table would be an argument that is not actually necessary, meaning a waste of time, because size of commitment is up to the reader. by the way, for each alledged trade you supposed made, your account soars, and so we are to conclude that you are playing with not exactly retirement money? side remark: the claim that anyone can consistently see a whole lot of corners is laughable, not taken seriously in any case, and surely you did not mean it. reminder: you of course know, that on a battlefield, the most dangerous twit is the one with the map. chugs, tj

To: blazenzim who wrote (33814)	4/26/2008 9:43:18 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217567

#44.