Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (33837)	4/24/2008 4:36:16 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217792

Good grief, instant correlation. 1990 and Y2K were both the peaks of sunspots and heading into a financial crunch. Now, cycle 23 predicts a rapid climb out to another peak. That's a huge buy signal. But I'd like to see cycles going back a century or ten to get a better idea of longer term correlations. It might be just that Uncle Al KBE skewed things and made it look as though it was sunspots when it was really him doing it. Big Ben is now doing stuff too, but he is and says he is reactive rather than driving the process. He looks at what has already happened then acts accordingly. So he is a subset of Haim's Theorem. Look how steeply rising cycle 23 is expected to be in that link you gave. A veritable boom should come with that. Not only that, but 23 is a lucky number too. A mathematically significant prime number as well. 1 is the primary prime number, 2 and 3 are also important prime numbers and 23 is a continuation of the series. It's probably not a rigorous proof of Haim's Theorem, but it's looking good. Mqurice