Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (78370)	4/26/2008 2:53:48 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

edit. Meant as a reply to Dan3 Ultimately, solar may show a lot more promise than it does now, but meanwhile we need to either get clean energy from a proven source (nukes) or agree to condemn Billions of innocent children to starvation. We need it yesterday, not someday. ----- if you want it now...get solar panels...get a solarhart water heater Hawaii is showing the way. We are the most energy isolated urban area in the world and our electric rates with fuel surcharge are now over 40¢ kwh. People complained 20 years ago when it was 10¢ and the mainland was 3¢ In urban areas like SoCal, AZ, FL , Atlanta, etc. solar should be required on all new construction and subsidized on existing. We could solarize the sunny areas in the US much faster than we could build nukes....and where is the fuel for nukes going to come from? Not to mention we would be creating a new industry with massive job increases.