Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (380612)	4/26/2008 3:22:35 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573123

Whether it was "their land" depends solely on what arbitrary cutoff date you want to apply going backward. Are you familiar with the legal concept of "adverse possession"? The Zionists cut a backroom deal with the Brits but they did, for the most part, buy the land fairly and squarely. It wasn't so much adverse possession but the fact that the Zionists were wealthier than the Palestinians and could do things economically that the Palestinians couldn't do. Now the deal with the Brits is that the Zionists would be allowed to occupy the land and do what they wanted with it. Later, of course, the Zionists informed the Brits that they wanted their own state. When the Brits balked, that's when Zionist terrorists began attacking the Brits. Even so, had the US not stepped in, Israel would not have happened.