SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (118869)4/27/2008 5:06:20 PM
From: Smiling BobRespond to of 306849
 
Obama should have never lost PA
Got to get this guy in there!
---
In 2003, a University of Chicago economist named Austan Goolsbee (now a senior economic adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign) published an op-ed in the New York Times pointing out how the government had minimized the depth of the 2001-2002 U.S. recession, having "cooked the books" to misstate and minimize the unemployment numbers.
--

Goolsbee's work- full text
ppionline.org
---
Why Deficits Still Matter
by Austan Goolsbee
The United States has run massive budget deficits every year the Bush
administration has been in office. The latest budget projections from the
White House show annual deficits in the $250 billion range for the rest of the
president’s term, at which point nearly $3 trillion will have been added to the
national debt.1 In fact, George W. Bush has presided over the biggest fiscal
deterioration in American history—a sorry legacy considering his predecessor
left him a healthy budget surplus projected to be $5 trillion over 10 years.
Austan Goolsbee is a senior economist for PPI and the Democratic Leadership Council.
This did not happen by accident. White
House officials have repudiated the Clinton
administration’s view that fiscal responsibility
lays the groundwork for sustained economic
growth. Often identified with former Treasury
Secretary Robert Rubin, this view held that
by running massive deficits and borrowing
heavily, the federal government drove up the
cost of capital. By cutting the deficit, it could
bring interest rates down and thereby
stimulate new waves of private investment.
The economic boom of the 1990s seemed
to prove Rubinomics right.
But Republicans have nonetheless
rejected that approach. Glenn Hubbard,
formerly President Bush’s top economic
adviser, said in a December 2002 speech:
“One can hope that the discussion will move
away from the current fixation with linking
budget deficits with interest rates.” When
pressed on the point, he responded: “That’s
Rubinomics, and we think it’s completely



To: bentway who wrote (118869)4/27/2008 5:20:48 PM
From: Giordano BrunoRespond to of 306849
 
What do you think?



To: bentway who wrote (118869)5/1/2008 11:09:30 AM
From: Les HRead Replies (5) | Respond to of 306849
 
Two more years of rising food prices

You may have to get used to paying more for your groceries for another two years or more. Experts say an increase in global food consumption combined with increasing use of crops such as corn and soybeans for alternative fuel production are partly to blame.

Agricultural economists who've studied food price fluctuations cite historical trends that show run-ups in farm commodity prices typically happen in five-year cycles. Prices flare up in the first two to three years of the cycle and then start to moderate by the fourth or fifth year, said Chris Hurt, agricultural economist at Purdue University. If 2007 was the first year of this latest cycle, Hurt said farm supply could start catching up to demand by 2010, helping to push down milk, bread, cereal and other grocery prices.

Until then, "Americans will be moving backward in their lifestyle."

By that he means that more families will trade down to cheaper food alternatives, or eat out less often, in order to adjust their budgets to both higher food and fuel costs.

arkansasmatters.com

Hard Numbers: The economy is worse than you know

tampabay.com