Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quehubo who wrote (99906)	4/27/2008 9:34:10 PM
From: Webster Groves	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206126

I wasn't aware the GW movement had any real influence. It is just a convenient foil. In reality, coal is looking up: csmonitor.com msnbc.msn.com Last year TXU played a clever gambit to get its plants approved: dallasnews.com .. and I'm sure others will do them same. (If you want to build a couple of plants, ask for ten, then compromise on only 2.) If your plant proposal is rejected (as in Kansas) then you simply need to be more "persuasive" in reaching out to the politicians, and in politics money talks. The GW issue is simply used as a foil to entice concessions and favors from those with the dough. Nobody in real power in the US really believes in it. wg