SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Vet who wrote (93890)4/29/2008 5:01:53 PM
From: dybdahl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
I commented on "The main drawbacks are transmission and storage." My comment was, that if energy gets expensive enough, solar energy becomes competitive. If transmission and storage is a problem, you can store energy as liquid fuels. It will cost you something in effectiveness, but almost any kind of energy can be stored as liquid fuels. Hydrogen is another example of a liquid fuel, but which requires high pressure or low temperature.

This may require you to generate and use electric power as part of the process. But it doesn't mean that you need to transport the electric power in a power grid.

On Iceland, they use thermal energy to produce aluminum. Instead of transporting the energy to an aluminum plant elsewhere, the need for energy transport is now handled by moving aluminum on ships.

I hope this explanation makes things clearer.



To: The Vet who wrote (93890)4/30/2008 12:14:11 AM
From: gregor_us  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
Kismet: Your Question about the storage of energy derived from Solar, and stored using fluid, is the subject of a key post today at TOD: anz.theoildrum.com

Ammonia, no less.

--Regards, Gregor