Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (76791)	5/1/2008 3:09:16 PM
From: whisperer	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 197060

Therefore the only way the SULA could possibly have been in force for Nokia to violate would be if Qualcomm's theory of implicit extension is valid. This theory depends on an interpretation of California Law vis-a-vis continued "use" of the patents. I recall NOK sending QCOM a check for 20M$ after the '01 SULA expired. One could argue that NOK has in fact extended the SULA by continuing to use QCOM IP and publicly admitting it needs to pay for it. -W