Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (122185)	5/2/2008 9:34:04 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 173976

barrack = barruk riding horse of muhammed - dead horse -

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (122185)	5/2/2008 10:53:25 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

For those that don't know - Google Paul vs Clinton and hold on to your shirt with what you read!! L.A., California Case #BC304174 For those of you who think this case has been thrown out - is hasn't, or is irrelevant - think again: "In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25, 2008 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!." "Had Senator Clinton be forced to testify under oath, as a material witness and beneficiary of the fraud that her husband is being sued for before the Democratic Convention, her remote chances for being nominated the party candidate would have been unquestionably destroyed." "Paul contends his case will expose "the institutional culture of corruption embraced by the Clinton leadership of the Democratic Party," which seeks to attain "unaccountable power for the Clintons at the expense of the rule of law and respect for the constitutional processes of government." All the court documents/evidence is here: peterfpaul.com Posted by: Jane \| May 2, 2008 2:55 PM

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (122185)	5/2/2008 10:54:06 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 173976

John B. Sheffield....awesome comment!! If Hillary wins the whole thing...will she testify in the Clinton V. Paul campaign fraud trial?? Judge Munoz decided she does not have to testify until after the election, the rest of the trial will get started sooner. So, will the President of the United States of America actually testify at her own trial? We already have our first pre-presidential drama!! Stay Tuned folks... - Will the President actually testify? - Could Bill Clinton get the first pardon of the new presidency? - How much will she charge for the pardon? - If she is found guilty in some way...can she pardon herself? - How much will she charge herself...to get herself off the hook? The Clintons have brought more shame than anyone to the presidency. Has this country lost the plot or what? Posted by: Very Concerned \| May 2, 2008 2:58 PM

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (122185)	5/2/2008 10:54:53 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Tell me, does it make sense to give money to one candidate and vote for the other. look at these numbers about who contributed to each candidate and by how much, is there any relationship between a person's contribution and how much that person makes ? how is Hillary the favored by 'Blue collar ' voter when twice as much 'blue collar' voters gave money to Obama not Hillary -----> follow the link below to the money. opensecrets.org Posted by: lol \| May 2, 2008 2:59 PM

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (122185)	5/2/2008 10:55:43 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 173976

Barack Obama has been conducting a gentlemanly campaign (mostly), whereas the Clintons and their tribe have been scorch and burn with the help of the media. So the Dems should be afraid that the Republicans will tear Obama apart???? No, No, imagine if they had the chance to dine on the tasty morsels of Clinton's past--from the time she was a trial lawyer vs a rape victim, to her seat on the board of the anti union Walmart, whitewater, travelgate and "Paul v. Clinton" now in the California Courts---how did she rig it so that her testimony can't be taken til after November. Do what Jane said, google Paul V. Clinton---"In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25, 2008 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!." "Had Senator Clinton be forced to testify under oath, as a material witness and beneficiary of the fraud that her husband is being sued for before the Democratic Convention, her remote chances for being nominated the party candidate would have been unquestionably destroyed." "Paul contends his case will expose "the institutional culture of corruption embraced by the Clinton leadership of the Democratic Party," which seeks to attain "unaccountable power for the Clintons at the expense of the rule of law and respect for the constitutional processes of government." All the court documents/evidence is here: peterfpaul.com Posted by: Dennis \| May 2, 2008 3:06 PM