SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (248622)5/3/2008 10:29:54 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
Thanks all for that feed back. Can we say that routine audits are only done in the prior tax year and audits of returns from farther back only happen if the IRS has evidence of fraud?



To: Alan Smithee who wrote (248622)5/3/2008 10:46:42 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
To recall how this line started, Franken's spokesman said - Franken was unable to reconstruct his tax situation prior to 2003 because those years' financial records weren't complete.

Would this be enough for the IRS to start an investigation, especially in light of Franken's other tax problems?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News