SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (63425)5/4/2008 10:22:03 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542087
 
Syb -

I'm planning to try to negotiate with them. The fact that I had no way of knowing they were out of network will be a part of my argument. There's also the fact that their delay in billing me has led to very bad timing, in terms of my ability to pay.

- Allen



To: epicure who wrote (63425)5/5/2008 5:54:05 AM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 542087
 
I think they have a legal duty to tell you if they aren't.

If they don't, they should. It's reasonable to put the onus on the patient to check to see if a clearly private provider to whom one is referred is on one's insurance list. But in a facility that is a designated preferred provider, it's reasonable to assume that the personnel assigned to you by the system are part of the system.

I ended up in an emergency room about a year ago and was surprised when I got a separate bill from the designated attending. It wasn't a lot of money so it was no big deal but I think that a warning is called for.