SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (382992)5/7/2008 11:39:17 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1570977
 
Ten, this is typical.

Katrina, of course, was a hurricane -- but the humanitarian crisis was not that of a hurricane, but that of a flood -- a totally different kind of tragedy.

Now, who would have expected a flood in a major city that lies totally beneath sea level, effectively in a bowl? A coastal city where they rely on massive pumps capable of flowing the equivalent of the entire Ohio River daily -- to keep the city from flooding. In a city where a simple rainstorm overwhelmed the pumping system only 10 years earlier. And now, comes a huge hurricane. Who would have thought it?

So, what do they do? Blame it on Bush. Blame it on global warming. There are no natural disasters, and our federal government ought to be able to fix anything that happens.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (382992)5/7/2008 11:41:41 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570977
 
None of those links said:

"After Hurricane Katrina, every hurricane season which followed was supposed to be worse due to global warming."