SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (64433)5/8/2008 12:34:18 PM
From: DanD  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542528
 
Did I mock? Sorry to give that impression. I thought I was pretty clear that your observations were simply irrelevant in a discussion of climate change, unless, you could show some causal link.

No mocking intended at all.

But now you change the subject away from your observation evidence to this theme of grand climate change over time.

But then say you're against fixing it unless polluters such a China and India are held to the same standards. (I think).

Which is it? Grand global natural change? Or Grand global "man made including China and India" change?



To: ManyMoose who wrote (64433)5/8/2008 12:35:14 PM
From: Bridge Player  Respond to of 542528
 
I against throwing money at it in some futile attempt that does not include the major emerging polluters like India, China, and the like.

So was the U.S. Senate, 95-0, in 1997.