SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (383471)5/9/2008 3:43:14 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1573433
 
"I guess it is pointless after all this time that we aren't at war with Iraq, we are at war with radical islam. It just happens the battlefield is IN Iraq."

Dave, Saddam was a SECULAR leader. Not a "radical Islamist". Being a paranoid, power-mad dictator, he was strongly opposed to anything that threatened that, such as radical Islam, and in particular, Iranian radical Islam.

"Complicated, I know. Read it 2 or 3 times maybe you'll get it."



To: i-node who wrote (383471)5/9/2008 4:37:23 PM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1573433
 
I guess it is pointless after all this time that we aren't at war with Iraq, we are at war with radical islam. It just happens the battlefield is IN Iraq.

I mean, this is your only stand...any caving on this and the house of ideological cards collapses. Iraq is the one place in the ME this battlefield was not. Now much of it is coming under the influence of Iran and there is not a damn thing we can do about it. The strategy was so ill conceived it's scary to think that such arrogant and stupid men are in charge of a country with as much power as ours.

Al



To: i-node who wrote (383471)5/9/2008 5:32:22 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573433
 
we are at war with radical islam. It just happens the battlefield is IN Iraq.


Why isn't the battlefield in Saudi Arabia? That's where radical islam is.

TP