Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Aardvark Adventures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ACAN who wrote (4703)	5/11/2008 5:02:50 PM
From: creede	Respond to of 7944

Gotta show you guys this post from Ihub regarding LBWR. Right on the money, imo. siliconinvestor.com Posted by: twoggle In reply to: sandintheshorts who wrote msg# 5734 Date:5/11/2008 4:50:35 AM Post #of 5741 Not that it matters so much what the cash flow was two years ago.... The company's financial statement that was available to the public at the time of Creede's questions (April, 2006) shows that it was cash flow positive. Of course, financial statements submitted later in 2006 show later quarters to be cash flow negative. I don't think anyone but someone selling the stock short would care about ancient history. There is no evidence from the filings that Dexter was selling shares at the time of Creede's question. There were some shares sold, probably later that quarter. But the O/S has stayed pretty steady: O/S on June 30, 2006: 139,799,001 Current O/S in IBox: 140,899,001 (almost two years later!) Float =~ 17 million shares. Increasing revenue, essentially no dillution compared to almost every other pinksheet company, very low float, moving (slowly) to the OTCBB, filing with the SEC, ungagged TA, and a CEO with many years in the field! Who would be dumb enough to sell their shares now!? I'm buying more! T GB-ND-27 c