Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (21530)	5/11/2008 11:47:36 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Uh?? I've nothing against POV's supported by data. The problem is if one POV is religious and lacks supportive data, while the other is well supported by data and is not religious. The chap I posted to, has a serious problem in figuring out what both science and religion are. AFAIK, he does not understand either. I have no problem with the public school system discussing creationism in a survey of world religions type of class. I have a very big problem when they want to cast FUD on evolution in biology classes for the sake of a particular brand of religion and its myths. There are many religions with many creations myths, but oddly, in the USA, only one myth is pushed as somehow having "scientific" validity (which of course it does not).