Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Senior who wrote (30921)	5/12/2008 8:12:48 PM
From: anializer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78755

Hard to understand such a negative reaction to what I consider a good report. Seems to be all a game run by the analysts. Miss their estimates and you get clocked. Beat their estimates and you rocket like FLR in AH tonight. I've been out of OMG a while but it does look cheap here to me again. Seems to me the favored companies that have institutional darling status also have an analyst contingent that purposefully keep the estimates beatable when they want the stock higher.

To: Paul Senior who wrote (30921)	11/5/2009 4:29:49 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78755

I'll step aside from OMG now. Maybe reenter at a later time. Stock closed $29.30. finance.yahoo.com My earliest position at $9.58 from 10/2002. A loser for me nonetheless. Well when you average up on a position near highs (buys $51 through $28 (2008)), it happens. I may have gotten commodity-greedy. -g- Sometimes I got to learn to be taking out profits, and not be taking on more stock after a move up finance.yahoo.com Original reason for holding stock still valid for me though. Rising stated book value (now about $37), stock in past often trading at bv or higher.