Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (384102)	5/13/2008 11:26:28 AM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1575183

On the crucial remedial question that ensured Governor Bush’s election, the majority’s decision appears to be simply indefensible. And the majority opinion insisted that its rationale was to be applied, essentially, only in this case—basically conceding that the result, not the legal principle, dictated the outcome. As I pointed out, people, including true legal scholars, are all over the place -- mostly along party lines. There is really no value in rehashing it. The Court decided as it did, but it made absolutely no difference -- Bush won the election either way. As to the point of judicial activism, you think it is, I think it isn't. There is no point in going on about it.