SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter V who wrote (123174)5/15/2008 1:13:16 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Fed Balance Sheet Worries Volker (my, my, he's getting feisty lately!)

online.wsj.com

Fed Balance Sheet Worries Volcker
Ex-Chairman Sees
Fed's Independence
Hurt by Credit Steps
By GREG IP
May 15, 2008; Page A3

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker said the Fed's independence could be hurt by the wide variety of assets it has taken onto its balance sheet to combat the credit crunch.


Since the credit crisis began last August, the Fed has expanded the volume and types of loans it is willing to make to banks and securities dealers -- loans that are backed by a wide variety of collateral from subprime mortgages to student loans. It has so far not directly purchased such debt. It did, however, make an unprecedented loan of $29 billion to facilitate the sale of Bear Stearns Cos. to J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Mr. Volcker, testifying on responses to the credit crisis at the Joint Economic Committee of Congress Wednesday, said such activity "has not been the tradition of the central bank and I think that is an issue for the long run for the independence of the central bank. If it is going to be looked to as the rescuer or supporter of a particular section of the market, that is not strictly a monetary function in the way it's been interpreted in the past."<snip>

<snip>Mr. Volcker laid part of the blame for the current crisis at the feet of banking regulators, including the Fed. "Why were [the banks] permitted to set up those off-balance-sheet entities that may or may not have had some formal relationship with the bank? They were not regulated and [banks] didn't hold an adequate amount of capital against them. Why did that happen after the experience of Enron?"<snip>

Damn fine questions....why hasn't Clowngress asked it, they've met with Soylent Greenspan and Bernanke frequently and had the opportunity......