Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28136)	5/15/2008 6:21:48 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 224748

Well, one thing is certain we don't even need a military no less someone who understands them...right? We can just have Obama Speech'upon'em and clouds will clear and the sun will shine! Hershey bars will be 5 cents and huge!

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28136)	5/15/2008 6:38:27 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Respond to of 224748

Which side first declared war? Do you know? Obambi will lay down and roll over for radical Islam.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28136)	5/15/2008 6:48:45 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Lame Duck........ The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to approve a five-year, $307 billion farm bill, sending it to President Bush for what is expected to be his futile veto.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28136)	5/15/2008 8:02:59 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224748

Obama & Dems defend appeasement - by treating the Presidents general remarks about appeasement as an attack against Obama they inadvertently confirm Obama is pro-appeasement. Dems, Obama fake anger over Bush's reasonable remarks Peter Wehner: ... Obama’s faux anger in reaction to Bush’s speech is ludicrous. For one thing, the President did not even mention Senator Obama in his speech. What the President was rebutting was a (fairly prevalent) cast of mind, one which is shared by Obama but by many others–including Jimmy Carter, who just returned from the region, as well as a people serving in Bush’s own State Department. For Obama’s communications director to call the President’s remarks an “unprecedented political attack on foreign soil” is utter nonsense. More than that, though, Obama’s reaction is exactly the kind of “distraction” that he constantly complains about–even when the issues raised are legitimate ones to discuss (like his association with the Reverend Wright). To take a serious address like the one President Bush delivered in Israel today and shoehorn it into a campaign is exactly the kind of thing that drags down political discourse in America–and is the opposite of what Obama claims to represent. With every passing week, it seems, the gap between what Obama says he is and how he acts is widening. His campaign’s latest attack looks contrived, petty, and stupid–unworthy even of our “old politics.” Obama calls attention to his naive agreement to meet without preconditions some of the worlds worst leaders. The Bush statement about appeasement was correct. The tantrum by the Democrats only brings attention to this naive policy. Posted by Merv prairiepundit.blogspot.com MEMO TO THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN: When somebody condemns appeasement, it doesn't help things to jump up and yell "Hey, he's talking about me!" ht pajamasmedia