SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JeffA who wrote (123638)5/16/2008 2:34:53 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 173976
 
I never smear anyone. When I make a strong criticism or expose a scandal it's truthful and has credible sources. For instance, the story of GW Bush's 1972 cocaine arrest. The paper evidence has all been destroyed and only about a dozen people even knew it happened. But Hatfield's book "Fortunate Son" details two of Bush's party buddies at the time who talked so long as their names weren't used. What they told Hatfield makes all the sense in the world and totally explains why Bush disappeared that year. Dan Rather's people knew this, so Rather had to be destroyed before he could follow that story to its natural conclusion.

The above is not a smear, it's based on credible sources and common sense logic. It also explains why Bush could never deny doing cocaine.