Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ampex Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Heibeck who wrote (5509)	5/18/2008 6:50:14 AM
From: fuddled	Respond to of 5839

Yes, we've all overpaid the admission price for this movie's ticket, and you don't get your money back as the movie is finished. What's ridiculous is that Bramson can't sell or market a damn thing. Yet every company he's raided since Ampex, their stock prices have remained higher since his raids. That includes, 4imprint, Elementis, Spirent, Nautilus. Only Ampex's stock price has diminished to zero. From a V.C.'s point of view, Bramson has been very successful with every company except Ampex. But from a personal point of view, he's still successful with Ampex via Hillside. Since the "bankruptcy" (guffaw), his stake in Ampex has never been richer. So much for his dedication to noblesse oblige to ALL stakeholders.

To: Dave Heibeck who wrote (5509)	5/18/2008 10:45:53 AM
From: DAMNEDIFYOUDO	Respond to of 5839

Dave, the shares should have the purchase date on them and they have the records, I wouldn't worry about that...What I'm thinking the reason to keep the shares trading as long as possible, that only long term holders will receive any distribution in any or most of the any new IP, ie. 1 yr or more, is to wipe out about half of the float,,so the pie is divided only to 2mil. shares or so of the %50...Maybe that's why VV and Gruber have been mute...Does anyone else see it this way, or do all shareholders get equal treatment no matter when purchased..??