Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (251983)	5/19/2008 1:12:53 PM
From: jay101	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Forget all the 'High falootin' formulae and legal mumbo jumbo Try and understand what the word "efficient" means .... Can YOU honestly apply this adjective to AMD ? ( I suppose the EU does ... but the EU IS rather abnormal in their business practices and perceptions.) ef·fi·cient : –adjective 1. performing or functioning in the best possible manner with the least waste of time and effort; having and using requisite knowledge, skill, and industry; competent; capable 2. satisfactory and economical to use: 3. producing an effect, as a cause; causative. 4. utilizing a particular commodity or product with maximum efficiency (usually used in combination dictionary.reference.com

To: fastpathguru who wrote (251983)	5/19/2008 1:13:59 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

FPG, > The only way Intel could price their processors on average below their LTSAP against an "equally efficient competitor" is if they didn't expect to be competing against the EEC forever. OK, let's use your definition of "LTSAP." Obviously Intel is pricing well above their own LTSAP, because it's been decades since Intel posted a loss. How can Intel price below the LTSAP of an "equally efficient competitor"? If said EEC has a higher LTSAP, then it isn't "equally efficient" in my mind. Once again, X > Y > X. Tenchusatsu