SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sr K who wrote (250721)5/19/2008 11:07:56 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
The biggest stark contrast is George Soros and the endless gusher of money MoveOn.Org pumps into the Obama campaign and if Obama loses it won't be for lack of money.

* * *



To: Sr K who wrote (250721)5/19/2008 11:13:41 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
it is or was not the issues. It is hope versus the past. It's an easy choice for voters.

Curious, then, then Obama keeps insisting that he is talking about the "issues" and keeps demanding that all his opponents talk only about the "issues" - meaning, of course, they they NOT criticize anything that Obama said, or his wife said, or his campaign said.

Here's another choice for you: it's a choice between rhetoric and reality. Obama can only offer rhetoric because he doesn't have enough experience to approximate reality.