Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sr K who wrote (250761)	5/20/2008 12:15:10 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 793895

I don't think he wants to pit Cindy versus Michelle. You were the one who believed Michelle was competent. Is one not allowed to ask for evidence? I'm interested in issues and the candidates, not personalities. Except Bill Clinton in the wings was a fair factor. Bill is fair game, and so is Michelle as long as she keeps stumping for Barack. Nobody gets to declare that public speeches must only be listened to by supporters, but must be ignored by critics.

To: Sr K who wrote (250761)	5/20/2008 12:24:05 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793895

. I don't think he wants to pit Cindy versus Michelle. I'm interested in issues and the candidates, not personalities. On point one, Cindy is not out on the stump advocating policy. She is playing the "typical candidates wife" role. Michelle is an active campaigner. So that's "apples and oranges." Point two is you are defending Obama's attempt to stop looks at his and his wife's character. Anybody can write up a nice policy position. They mean little or nothing. What counts is the person who implements this policy. We knew going in that there was a problem with the Clinton's character. But the MSM did their best to spike and spin it. It hurt the country when it developed during his Presidency. As an example see how messed up our Al Qaeda response was during the "stained dress" episode.