Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (252185)	5/20/2008 8:42:02 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

CJ I believe I am the one who brought the term "novel" into the discussion. I hope you won't think I was lying to the Judge... Intel actually said AMD's position "is clearly at odds with case Law" and "AMD's position has no basis in Law". That's Intel's argument. Intel cites numerous instances of case law and also quotes Justice Breyer: "when prices exceed incremental costs, one can not argue that they must rise for a firm to stay in business. Nor will such prices have a tendency to exclude or eliminate equally efficient competitors". Interestingly enough, Intel's filing also says AMD makes only one specific claim of below-cost pricing.