Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (385335)	5/20/2008 9:17:01 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576807

"It isn't the end of the world if some particular species of fish becomes nearly extinct." No, but at some point you run out of exploitable species. "Chances are, they'll be back over time, and if not, it wasn't meant to be." Given the number of species that have bounced back, it seems like it never is meant to be.

To: i-node who wrote (385335)	5/20/2008 9:34:48 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576807

" It isn't the end of the world if some particular species of fish becomes nearly extinct. " well.com Not for us, not yet. Every animal that vanishes because we've appropriated their habitat, poisoned them, killed their food or what ever the cause, is on OUR heads. We're their custodians, their keepers. We own the Earth now. Every animal we extinguish is a miracle of billions of years of evolution that we can't recreate. Every animal we drive to extinction should be a major source of shame for the responsible among us. That doesn't include you.