SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (35000)5/21/2008 5:24:54 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217822
 
Let's Nationalize the Airlines! "I am a capitalist pig. I am a total economic libertarian, and I am ready to send the airline executives to the gulag. You know, I am ready to nationalize the whole thing."

-- P.J. O'Rourke, speaking on Real Time With Bill Maher, March 21, 2008

Uh-oh.

You know it's bad when a confessed economic libertarian wants to shut you down. But O'Rourke has a point. Take a look at yesterday's lowlights:

United Airlines parent UAL (Nasdaq: UAUA) said its net loss for the first quarter more than tripled to $4.45 a share from $1.32 a share in last year's Q1. And that's in spite of a 7.7% increase in operating revenue.
JetBlue (Nasdaq: JBLU) fared far better. First-quarter operating revenue climbed 34% to $816 million. Profits, however, remained elusive: JetBlue lost $0.04 a share in Q1.
Neither report pleased investors. Nor did the news that oil had topped $119 per barrel. UAL shares sold off more than 36%. JetBlue fell nearly 6%.

Choking on black gold
Not surprisingly, fuel prices hurt both carriers, as they did AMR (NYSE: AMR), Continental (NYSE: CAL), and Southwest (NYSE: LUV) last week. And don't think Delta (NYSE: DAL) and Northwest (NYSE: NWA) escaped, either, because they didn't, as today's reports show.

But it was JetBlue that really suffered. Its fuel costs rose 61.8% to burn up nearly 38% of first-quarter revenue. UAL, meanwhile, saw fuel expenses rise 51.3%, to consume 39% of revenue.

And it could get worse. Per-barrel oil prices have risen 17.5% since March 31. United, for its part, told investors that it would cut 1,100 workers and mothball 30 of its most inefficient aircraft. UAL also plans to cut nonfuel costs by $200 million and capital expenditures by another $200 million.

JetBlue told investors it would limit capacity growth as it has in the past and charge a $20 service fee to passengers traveling with more than one checked bag. (Anyone else wonder how that's going to work out when oil goes past $120 a barrel? Moving on.)

Buh-bye, bargains
Bigger than either story, though, was the one that got largely ignored. Except, that is, by investors. The CEOs of soon-to-be-combined Delta and Northwest, Richard Anderson and Doug Steenland, respectively, said that airlines have to raise prices 15%-20% because most cost-cutting measures have been exhausted.

(Thud.)

Don't worry. That's the just the major airline labor leaders. They fainted upon hearing that the management team of a major carrier might finally stop trying to take salaries and benefits away from them.

Isn't it about time? Fares have fallen consistently since the 9/11 attacks, yet carriers continue to promise more legroom, better entertainment, and so on. JetBlue still makes this pitch today. Anderson and Steenland argue that such a model isn't sustainable. I agree.

Take a closer look at JetBlue's income statement.

Metrics
Q1 2008
Q1 2007
Difference

Revenue
$816
$608
$208

Aircraft fuel
($308)
($190)
$118

Source: JetBlue press release. Numbers in millions.
More than half of the gains made on the top line were wiped out by higher fuel prices. Talk about a thumb in the eye.

Let's put this into context. Nationally, gasoline now sells for more than $3.50 per gallon, on average. Americans have been paying dearly at the pump to get to school, commute to work, and take vacations. But at the exit row? We're still breathlessly pining for cheap fares. Bill Shatner says we should. It is, after all, just a matter of negotiating.

Or is it?

Here's my point. For all of the blunders airlines have made -- and there have been many -- the inescapable truth is that we travelers are paying less than we did six years ago. Yet per-barrel oil prices are up more than 300% over the same period.

Nationalize the airlines? I have a better idea. How about we all just agree to pay our fair share?

More airline Foolishness:

Talking with JetBlue's chief.
Watching another one bite the dust.
Saving money at Virgin.



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (35000)5/21/2008 5:28:01 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217822
 
Fly Jet Azul, David Neeleman's Brazilian Clone

While they talk about nationalization.
concierge.com

JetBlue founder David Neeleman yesterday revealed the name for his new Brazilian airline: "Azul." You can understand why he liked it, since that's Portuguese for blue. But the name was supposed to have been chosen by a democratic process, Ã la American idol, where people could have proposed names and then voted on the finalists. As a gimmick, it apparently succeeded: Some 108,000 people submitted entries, Neeleman said. But it appeared "Azul" didn't win the popular vote--more people voted for the other finalist, "Samba." So why rig the results? "Azul is a metaphor for security, serenity, loyalty, and quality--as well as connoting flight, as the color of the sky," Neeleman gushed. But he also hastened to add, "We want our company to define the name, not have the name define our company," which will begin flying 118-seat Embraer jets (with JetBlue touches like leather seats and live TV) between major Brazilian cities in January.

The name game brought back memories of JetBlue's startup, which I covered for Condé Nast Traveler in the December 1999 issue, two months before the airline's scheduled debut. (I later expanded the story into a book, Blue Streak). When Neeleman revealed that name to a packed news conference in mid 1999, few knew that the moniker wasn't his first choice. Actually, he'd wanted to call it simply "Blue" but was discouraged when his partners pointed out that he couldn't trademark it. That was after they'd sorted through hundreds of proposed entries from branding firms, ad agencies, and the like, ranging from clinkers like "Air Hop" to "Dairy Air" to oddball candidates like "Taxi" and "Home" (apparently so you could say "I'm flying Home"). They settled for "True Blue" but found, on the eve of the news conference, that a car rental company already trademarked the name. So in a rather testy phone call with his harried marketing person, Neeleman came up with JetBlue--not a moment too soon.

Neeleman's foray into the Brazilian airline scene, which is dominated by TAM and GOL airlines (which recently acquired former flag carrier Varig), might seem strange at first glance. But Neeleman was born in Brazil, where his journalist father was UPI bureau chief, and he holds dual citizenship; he also returned to the country as a teenager for a two-year stint as a Mormon missionary.

Uhm, most like to do missionary position :-)

Still, it's a bittersweet move in light of the events of the past year, during which Neeleman was pushed out as CEO of the airline he founded after the notorious meltdown in February of 2007 (dozens of planes were stuck on the tarmac at JFK during an ice storm). Neeleman will formally depart the JetBlue board this month, ending a ten-year run that even his detractors would have to concede had a huge influence on the industry. And it's showing up in other parts of the globe: Kingfisher Airlines, the Indian upstart that was patterned after JetBlue (its first president, Alex Wilcox, was one of Neeleman's top executives) is doing well and expects to be flying to New York from India this fall.

Posted at 03:30 PM in JUST IN | Permalink | Email this post | Reddit It | Digg This | Add to del.icio.us

Comments



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (35000)5/22/2008 1:16:40 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217822
 
Why the changes were so swift? I explain. Because the blocking was artificial.

Why Legendary Investors Are Buying Up Brazil
Today’s comment is by Sean Hyman, Currency Analyst for The Sovereign Society.

Dear A Letter Reader,

Oh how the tables have turned for Brazil. Why, back in the 1980s Brazil was defaulting on its debt and Brazil’s currency, the real was the laughing stock of the whole currency market. For currency investors, the real was as speculative as a penny-stock.

Roll the hands of time forward to today and it’s a whole new story. Savvy investors like Warren Buffet are holding the Brazilian real. Why in the world would he hold a currency from a country like this?

Well it’s no secret that natural resources have been enjoying a bull-market for a while now and according to Jim Rogers we’ve still got a long way to go in this commodity boom.

Hate These Sky-High Food Prices?
You Wouldn't If You Owned Brazil!

Brazil is a commodity rich nation. The largest South American country is also the world's largest producer of iron ore, coffee, and sugar (in fact, while the entire world struggles to pay for US$127 oil, Brazil has managed to cut their energy costs by mass producing sugar-based ethanol). Brazil is also a major exporter of soybeans, pork and beef. So as commodity prices continue to rise all over the world, Brazil is literally cleaning up.

Honestly, this is fairly typical. Whenever any shock hits the markets - whether it's a famine, hurricane, war, or market crash - some asset class, company or country always benefits. As my colleague Mike Burnick likes to say: there are profit opportunities found on the flip-side of every crisis! In this case, Brazil is in one of the best places to benefit from these worldwide food shortages, and rising commodity prices.

In fact, it's not just food products and iron ore that they export...the Brazilian's just discovered the largest oil field in the Western Hemisphere since the 1970s. So Petrobras, the state owned oil company, is looking pretty good also.

Money is flowing into Brazil from literally all over the world. They're not just dependent upon the United States to buy their goods. In fact, China, Asia, and Europe are huge customers of Brazil. That's why the slowdown in the U.S. hasn't even touched Brazil. In fact, their economy expanded 6.6% at the end of last year - while the U.S. slowed to just 0.6%.

If that wasn't enough, Brazil just received the coveted "Investment Grade" rating from S&P last month. As a result, a fresh pile of institutional cash is flowing into Brazil right now - and delivering another big boost to Brazilian share prices.

One Investment Grade Rating is Great,
But Two - Phenomenal!
It's rumored that Brazil may receive yet another investment grade rating coming from either Moody's or Fitch in the coming months. If that happens, yet another tidal wave of money will pour into Brazil's stocks, real estate, bonds, etc.

Usually when you know money is heading towards a country, you have to cherry pick specific index funds or invest in well-positioned stocks to benefit. But I have a way you can invest in Brazil, even if you have no idea where this investment money is heading: Their currency, the real.

Let me explain. In order to buy Brazilian stocks or bonds, you're going to have to buy the currency first. Same thing when buying their real estate - you'll need the real to close on properties.

So any way you slice it, Brazil's currency will benefit from its booming economy. Some investors argue the "B" of the BRIC nations is already too overbought. It's not.

Yes, the Brazilian real has climbed 22% over the last 12 months - more than any of the other top 16 currencies of the world. But I still think this nation could soar even higher. Here's why: Not only is the second round of money about to hit this country but also Brazil is investing in its future.


Making an Investment in Your Own Future

Brazil is already taking steps to ensure they continue prospering. In fact, on May 12th, Brazilian President Lula announced tax cuts for 25 industries. That will stimulate growth. But it gets even better. They are going to give billions of dollars in government loans to help their exports cope even more with the rising currency prices.

As of this writing, the Brazilian government has already announced US$12 billion in tax cuts. Plus, they're giving 10 times that amount to finance new machinery and infrastructure over the next three years.

Their newly formed Brazilian Sovereign Wealth Fund will also aid Brazilian companies reach overseas and bolster their growth. But wait, it gets even better....

Brazilian firms are also investing heavily in consumer electronics, aerospace, bio-fuel, software, and medicines. So Brazil will NOT be a "one hit wonder;" prospering only during the commodity boom years. No they're taking steps now to ensure they will be a viable economy long after the "resource boom" is over.

For instance, you'll see over 40 billion reals (US$24.3 million) spent on technology by 2010. Much of this technology is going to rush into these sectors: agribusiness, nanotechnology, biotechnology, biodiesel, perfume, oil, and gas.

Brazil's economy could continue to prosper for years to come. This is why a guy like Buffet can comfortably apply his long-term buy and hold strategy in a place like this. He sees how bright Brazil's future is, so he's buying the real.

I would recommend you also consider this booming economy when you're building your own diversified currency portfolio.

SEAN HYMAN, Currency Analyst

EDITOR'S NOTE: Brazil is riding high thanks in part to the commodity boom. This Thursday, May 22nd, Mike Burnick, Jack Crooks, Erika Nolan and Eric Roseman will host a special webinar to explain the huge upside potential found in one particular sector of Brazil's booming economy! You're invited to join us at NOON on Thursday May 22 - absolutely FREE. No catches, just sign up to join us and find out how to tap into this dynamic region. Click here to sign up now



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (35000)5/23/2008 4:05:41 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217822
 
set aside growing mistrust and ideological divisions today in Brasilia to sign a treaty to create a continental bloc modeled on the European Union.

Elroy, we are building in all fronts. Pragmatically. Methodicaly. Under the right leadership of you know whom...

Lets get our flock into the right path unde the guidanc eof the shepherd :-)

South American Presidents Meet on New Bloc as Mistrust Builds

By Joshua Goodman

May 23 (Bloomberg) -- Leaders of 12 South American nations will set aside growing mistrust and ideological divisions today in Brasilia to sign a treaty to create a continental bloc modeled on the European Union.

The agreement to create the Union of South American Nations, or Unasur, is unlikely to bear fruit, given increased antagonism over Venezuela's alleged support for Marxist rebels in Colombia and the countries' divergent economic policies, said Michael Shifter, vice-president of the Washington-based policy group Inter-American Dialogue.

``Unasur is a pipe dream for now,'' Shifter said. ``The irony is that economic conditions in the region have never been riper for this sort of integration.''

The summit marks the culmination of diplomacy started by Brazil in 2004 to unite the region's two main trading groups -- known as Mercosur and the Andean Community -- into a single bloc with gross domestic product of about $2 trillion.

It also follows other efforts, most promoted by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, to strengthen regional economic ties and counter U.S. influence. Those plans, such as a regional alternative to the International Monetary Fund known as the Bank of the South, are yet to yield concrete results.

Energy Goals

The Unasur treaty sets goals for integration of energy and transportation networks and immigration policies, Brazil's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. It also establishes a South American parliament in Cochabamba, Bolivia, the statement said.

The continental bloc, for now at least, is likely to exist only on paper. Similarly, the summit's show of unity will be brief despite Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's efforts to smooth over differences, Shifter said.

Chavez's allies Ecuador, Bolivia and Argentina are following Venezuela's policies by ramping up state intervention in their economies with price and export controls and nationalizations. Colombia, Chile, Peru and Brazil are sticking to a more pro-market course.

Colombian charges that Chavez supports a group classified by the U.S. and European Union as terrorist has deepened the division.

The treaty was originally scheduled to be signed in March. That event was canceled after a Colombian raid on a guerrilla camp of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, in Ecuador that killed a senior rebel commander. The incursion prompted protests from Venezuela and Ecuador, and both sent troops to their borders.

`Hostile to Investors'

Tensions spiked again last week after Interpol, the international police agency, authenticated computer files seized during the raid that Colombia said showed Chavez was arming and financing the rebels. Chavez dismissed the findings as a ``clown show.''

Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has cooled to plans for regional cooperation in light of his neighbors' failure to address Venezuelan support for the guerrillas. Colombia turned down an offer to take Unasur's first rotating presidency. Uribe told RCN radio May 21 that he supported having Chile assume that role. He also rejected a separate Brazilian initiative to forge a South American security agreement.

``Our difficulties are not only the FARC but also some governments in Latin America who don't like our development model,'' Uribe said during the radio interview. ``Some governments think being hostile to investors and reviving state-run monopolies is the only path to prosperity.''

Changed Map

Chavez, while proposing new agreements, has backed away from longer-standing cooperative efforts and in 2006 withdrew from the five-nation Andean Community over Colombia's bid for a U.S. free trade agreement.

He has since joined the Mercosur trade bloc. That group's slow progress over 17 years toward a common market of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay doesn't bode well for Unasur's prospects, Shifter said.

Nationalization of assets by Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia, which in 2005 forced Brazil's state-controlled oil company Petrobras to sell its refineries, also pose an obstacle to Unasur economic integration, said Rubens Barbosa, a former Brazilian ambassador to the U.S. and currently the president of the Foreign Trade Council at Sao Paulo's Industrial Federation.

``The region's political map has changed and many leaders in power are pursuing national policies that overwhelm their regional commitments,'' Barbosa said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Joshua Goodman in Rio de Janeiro at Jgoodman19@bloomberg.net



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (35000)5/23/2008 8:08:46 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217822
 
Let us count: 3% of the world population 50% of the supermodels. Caipirinha. 200 days of sun per year. No earthquake, nor Tsunami neither volcanoes. Good steak for BBQ. And on top of that oil? God must be Brazilian!



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (35000)8/1/2008 10:21:05 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217822
 
The Nobel Committee really needs to give a prize for monetary policy; from the above survey of mild or extreme inflation-producing sloppiness there can be no question that Brazil would win it and deservedly so.

Finally Brazil, which in the past has indulged in the typical Latin American follies of excessive government spending, wild borrowing sprees, hopelessly sloppy monetary policy leading to hyperinflation and inadequate protection of property rights, particularly foreign property rights. Now things are different. Foreign debt has halved as a percentage of GDP since 2002, while the government's finances are in only modest deficit. Foreign investment is encouraged and its rights protected. Most impressive, while inflation is around 6%, because of high commodity prices, the benchmark Selic interest rate has just been raised to 13%. At that level, inflation will be squeezed out of the system and excessive borrowing will be discouraged.

Thus when the commodities boom from which Brazil has benefited deflates, Brazil will be able to lower interest rates and continue domestic expansion without fear of running out of money. The Nobel Committee really needs to give a prize for monetary policy; from the above survey of mild or extreme inflation-producing sloppiness there can be no question that Brazil would win it and deservedly so.

It is unclear why Brazil has since 2002 deviated from the usual Latin American track, exemplified by the basket-cases of Argentina, Venezuela and Bolivia. One can speculate that the honor of being termed a BRIC super growth market - quite undeservedly so, in 2003 - caused Brazil to attempt to live up to its new billing - like the wayward teenager who is straightened out by a teacher who values his achievements.

atimes.com