Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (69364)	5/21/2008 2:10:04 PM
From: Snowshoe	Respond to of 74559

>>The mad crowd should not prevail.<< The mad crowd was blazenzim and the uproar he created. You should have nipped that mess in the bud.

To: elmatador who wrote (69364)	11/17/2008 2:27:47 PM
From: Snowshoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Elmat, Thanks for removing that "undue mocking" clause from your thread header after I complained about it. Good move! Now all you have to do is to unban Mq, and we'll be back to normal. Yes, sometimes he gets lazy and repeats the same stale rant one too many times. Like this lame post about Peter Blake... Message 24534924 But thats no reason to ban him for months on end. When Mq posts something that really bothers you, you can just ban him for 72 hours. Then the pressure will be on him, since he won't want to return after the ban because of his wounded pride. So you can sit back and relax in the warm glow of magnaminity, while the rest of us pester him to return! <g> Your call, -Snow