Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wbmw who wrote (252230)	5/21/2008 3:45:30 PM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

If you have a specific incidence that you know Intel has violated, then please present it here. Otherwise, you are not arguing anything new. It's just as easy to speculate that Intel is innocent of this "9th circuit's discount attribution standard" than it is to speculate that Intel is guilty. And that ambiguity through lack of facts is what makes this argument moot. Apparently not for you, as all of your arguments essentially boil down to, "Inconthievable!" youtube.com If you don't like discussions of theory, don't participate. fpg