SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (21660)5/21/2008 8:23:24 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 36918
 
this tag team crap is boring
yeah, like any politician isn't flying in their own plane!?
give me a break
it's actually beautiful open space there...I've been, you?
no
you're afraid of moose



To: average joe who wrote (21660)5/21/2008 10:51:29 PM
From: teevee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36918
 
The BC gov't has learned its lesson with Windy Craggy compensation:

No Compensation for Loss of Interests Related to Expropriation

B.C. plans to table a Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (Bill 43) which contains an amendment to the Law & Equity Act that would remove, or effectively remove, the right to compensation when rights on Crown land are expropriated.

www.leg.bc.ca/38th4th/1st_read/gov43-1.htm

This amendment has wide-reaching, serious implications for British Columbians.

I doubt lenders will finance mine development and I doubt the world bank will provide political project risk insurance if tenure can be expropriated at the whim of what ever gov't gets elected every 4 years in BC. For that matter, who would risk exploring in BC when the complaints by any special interest group could result in expropriation if it was politically expedient? If more provinces in Canada adopted this legislation, mining could be eliminated from the Canadian economy. Then the gov't could focus on a transition to a green economy based on sustainable development like eco tourism.