Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (67577)	5/21/2008 9:35:00 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 542532

I have no idea what you are talking about. I didn't twist their words. I didn't see THEM twisting any words. Logically, in any way, what does your twisting words have to do with my point- which was that Obama said nothing like what the article implied? The "opinion" that biofuels create genocide is not twisting words- it's a different POV held by some people in the world (people other than me.) So why don't you explain to me what your post was other than a massive red herring- because quite frankly I just don't see the point. You don't like the point of view expressed in the article? BFD- neither do I- but my point was that it represents the point of some people who do not live in America- quite a few of them- and being cognizant of that isn't (imo) a problem. "So - you rant about a twist of words to Tim about someone else and post that. Do you think what Chavez and Castro says makes a flip of difference? Those guys are two of the worst!" Rant is a little bit judgmental considering you really can't say anything to the point, don't you think? I mean your best defense is another word twist. Does that mean you agree the words were twisted, and that's the best you can come up with?