SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (67618)5/21/2008 11:38:08 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542914
 
Gotcha. I agree that rural areas get a higher dollop of federal dollars per person than cities.

I understand now what you meant about the freedom of choice in cities.

Aren't we blessed in this country to have wonderful wild areas and wonderful cities available for those who prefer them.

New York City is twice blessed because it has the Adirondacks so near. I love that area. At one time I even considered moving there. I've seen almost all of it, owing to my job at the time.

It's possible the parts of NYC I found objectionable were cleaned up by Rudy Giuliani. I didn't like the subways, dirt, crowds of people, and the traffic. I saw a car marooned on the Cross Bronx Expressway once. On the return trip, most of it was gone -- dismantled for the parts.

NYC might be fun if one had a lot of money to take advantage of the attractions.



To: JohnM who wrote (67618)5/21/2008 11:57:39 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542914
 
As I recall it, New York and New Jersey received back from the federal government some very small proportions relative to rural states.


It was a favorite topic for Daniel Moynihan. He got Harvard to do annual studies on it in the 90s. Here is a link that will lead you to more info:
hks.harvard.edu