SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28816)5/22/2008 3:42:57 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Yawn! We need to stop cry babies who whine and scream into our enemies ears so that we can have a successful military confrontation when necessary. Freaks like you and the other whiners KILL our troops by pumping up the enemy.

I remember the first time the fat Ted Kennedy shot off his piggy mouth "We don't belong there!" The next day there were Iraqis or who knows who protesting and holding up signs of Ted kennedy.

You liberals intentionally created a disastrous situation resulting in the loss of many lives just to politicize the war and push for it to fail. You gave the strength needed to the enemy.

There is no excuse and don't think for a minute you don't have your neighbor's boys blood on your hands. Don't talk to me about church anymore. You are a hypocrite!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28816)5/22/2008 6:23:11 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
What mindset is that, Kenneth--confronting terrorists who've sworn to wipe all Americans off the face of the earth??
The creator must've removed the backbone of every third American infant at birth. We know which political party the spineless joined.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28816)5/22/2008 10:19:28 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224748
 
kennyboy: do you smoke again and re-live those antiwar days of the sixties



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28816)5/22/2008 10:20:05 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224748
 
kennyboy, disgraceful demoRAT



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28816)5/23/2008 9:09:14 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224748
 
'Terror On Wane,' 'Al-Qaida On Run' And Other Headlines You Won't See
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:20 PM PT

Mileposts: As President Bush's term winds down, signs are there that the war on terror is being won. The conflict in Iraq is ebbing, and worldwide terror attacks are down. When will someone call it what it is? VICTORY.
Back from the front, Gen. David Petraeus called on Congress Thursday to begin considering a drawdown of U.S. troops after five years of war. Violence in Iraq has plunged to its lowest levels since 2004, and al-Qaida is a tattered shadow of its formerself — key leaders dead, successors weak and recruiting down.

"My sense" Petraeus said, "is I will be able to make a recommendation (in the autumn) for further reductions."

This is no Saigon-style exit, but a coming victorious end of a long conflict. U.S. forces have pounded al-Qaida into irrelevance.

Using highly disciplined Special Forces strikes, advanced intelligence and communications, and local allies in the right places, 155,000 U.S. troops have been crushing a vicious enemy motivated by no rational forces in a war with no precedent.

They are winning against all odds, overcoming not just terrorists, but other obstacles such as a lumbering Pentagon bureaucracy and weak-kneed Western intelligentsia whose media toadies trump every military error and harp on every isolated bad deed.

Now proven wrong, these same critics retaliate by ignoring what is a very big story.

Worldwide terror attacks have fallen off 40% since 2001, according to a study by Canada's Human Security Report Project, and support for al-Qaida in the Arab world has collapsed. The study found terror attacks had been overcounted because Iraq War atrocities distorted the figures. Security gains elsewhere included even sub-Saharan Africa, where the improvement was called "extraordinary."

Just as the conflict in Iraq is coming to a close, two related terror wars — in Spain and Colombia — are also seeing signs of victory.

Working with France's tough, savvy police forces, Spanish authorities on Tuesday arrested Javier Lopez Pena, the top terrorist of the Marxist ETA group responsible for 800 killings since 1968.

Lopez himself broke a cease-fire negotiated in 2006 and, assuming Spain wouldn't fight, resumed his bombings. His al-Qaida-linked group is now headless and unlikely to cause the same trouble. Sealing ETA's doom was the Spanish government's decision to confront rather than negotiate with the thugs, and then join with France.

Even more impressive, the FARC terrorist group in Colombia has been reduced to a ghostly remnant of its former self, unable to make payroll and its leaders terrified of being slaughtered by its remaining 9,000 foot soldiers out to collect government rewards.

Its leader, Raul Reyes, was killed in an airstrike March 1, and six other commanders have been either blown away or jailed.

This week, FARC commander Nelly Avila Moreno put down arms, admitted the FARC is "crumbling" and pleaded with her comrades to surrender. More than 1,000 FARC fighters, seeing no future against superior firepower and a united public, have done so.

FARC's terrorists can no longer communicate with each other except by messenger and are running out of money. Colombia's people completely despise it and are turning them in. Thursday, Colombia's army unearthed a huge FARC arsenal in the jungle, taking two tons of bombs and 8,000 land mines from FARC's bloody hands.

From the deserts of Iraq to the villages of Spain to the jungles of Colombia, these victories against terrorist groups are all linked. They are the result of using proven tactics, holding together resolutely, cooperating with other nations to share and deliver intelligence, and forming united fronts. When this happens, terrorists cannot flourish. Recent successes show that these wars are winnable.

So why are the mainstream media so eager to ignore this news, and let their dour view slant their coverage? By failing to recognize the emerging victory over terrorism, the media only damage public morale and give the terrorists hope.

But in the Internet age, the media can't hide the news forever: Victories are beginning to emerge from Iraq and beyond. Maybe the news media should drop their bias and catch up with reality.




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (28816)5/23/2008 1:13:37 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224748
 
unAmericankennyboy: WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Military officers who denounce policies they helped implement are "cowardly," the top U.S. officer charged on Friday in an apparent reference to retired generals' attacks on Iraq war policy.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of staff, told U.S. Naval Academy graduates that military officers face two options when political leaders do not follow their advice -- obey orders or quit.

Mullen said officers should not follow orders only to later leave the military and publicly criticize the plans they implemented.

"We give our best advice beforehand," he said. "If it's followed, great. If it's not, we only have two choices -- obey the orders we have been given, carrying them out with the professionalism and loyalty they deserve, or vote with our feet.

"That's it. We don't get to debate those orders after the fact. We don't get to say, 'Well, it's not how I would have done it,' or, 'If they had only listened to me,"' he said in Annapolis, Maryland. "Too late at that point and too cowardly."

In the past four years, some retired military officers who were on active duty during the initial stages of the Iraq war have publicly criticized the Bush administration's policy and management of that conflict.

Mullen, a 1968 academy graduate, stressed the importance of keeping the military politically neutral.

The United States does that by prohibiting active-duty personnel from participating in partisan politics. They cannot take part in campaigns, make political speeches or write political articles. They do not publicly express political opinions and must provide unvarnished advice to civilian leaders free of political motive.

But once military service members retire, there are no rules barring such conduct.