Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (101467)	5/23/2008 7:57:31 AM
From: Fugitive Pauper	Respond to of 206321

Ed, BOGA: >>I like this stock more now at $.50 than I did at $.35 before this news<< Me too. I picked up a few shares yesterday after the news at $0.45. This is the sort of performance that, if sustained, can cause the EV to double and, when the market cap is only a small fraction of the EV, that translates to a really large increase in share price. Besides, you seem to be on a white hot streak with your picks. Many thanks for sharing with us mere mortals.

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (101467)	5/23/2008 9:10:21 AM
From: dave rose	Respond to of 206321

Ed: Do you have any opinion on CLR? quotes.ino.com

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (101467)	5/23/2008 9:10:21 AM
From: dave rose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206321

Ed: Do you have any opinion on CLR? quotes.ino.com

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (101467)	6/25/2008 4:05:10 PM
From: Ken Ludwig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206321

Ed, I just bought a slug of BOGA at.36. That's .04 below the CEO's 3mm options just awarded.I like their progress and the current prices of both O&G. This was a move to strengthen my gassy holdings. Any idea why the drop off lately? Ameritrade wouldn't and won't let me buy online saying they are being cautious about manipulation of this stock. No biggie and I got quick fills (Then, I of course, thought I should have put in a lower order price)I couldn't find the terms of the convertible so i don't understand your comment about re setting the conv. price from .73. ken