Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (67962)	5/23/2008 1:21:23 PM
From: Katelew	Respond to of 542787

It was hurtful to us when claims of physical abuse were floated. Several weeks back, supposedly a disproportionate number of broken bones in small children was found. Whatever came of that? I never saw it confirmed or denied or followed up on.....did I miss it? Also, in the SLC Tribune today was a statement by the Attorney General of the State of Utah that indicated that in 2005 Texas fashioned some state laws that made this raid and the sexual abuse charges possible. Apparently, the Utah Atty. General was involved as a consultant, and at the time he advised the state of TX that the laws were not likely to hold up on a collective basis......that the charges would need to be adjudicated on a child by child basis. The main point, though, to me was that apparently the State of Texas had been gunning for this religious sect for a long time. This fact in turn makes the original phone call that triggered the raid even more suspicious. I hope investigative reporters stay with this case. What I read today makes the whole thing even smellier.