SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (251514)5/23/2008 11:55:13 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
look...

i don't see basically a dime's worth of difference between the political positions of HRC and obama...

so the argument of 'qualification' is totally invalid, imo...

and may i ask....exactly WHAT are her qualifications OVER obama...is she not also a *JUNIOR* senator....

oh wait...

her time in the white house as "first lady" gives her the experience edge.....riiiiight

her only real foray into public policy was health care reform, and that was an unmitigated disaster that handed the republicans the congressional majority

so basically it comes down to this:

there is very little daylight between the positions of HRC and obama....and therefore, obama is winning....let's see...

throw out the race card over and over

or

throw out the 'experience' (false) issue over and over

and oh gee,

if that doesn't work

throw out the notion that by golly there are lot of crazies out there who are willing to take out obama as the nominee (because, shhhhhh. dare we mention? he's black...and well "unvetted).....

well BS...

the dems need to run her out of town on a rail after this (of course they won't ) and the stinking addled brained horse (husband) she rode in on....

time to turn the page and move on, hill

oh and please remind me...just HOW MANY times was the RFK assassination mentioned in previous campaigns as a reason to stay? (none? right, i thought so)