Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (68186)	5/24/2008 10:00:03 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543351

I think you would manage to see the connection if Obama had said this and not Hillary. But there's no point arguing about it. You don't see what other people see in this. I accept that you do not.

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (68186)	5/24/2008 4:14:15 PM
From: Cogito	Respond to of 543351

>>What did she say about anybody being assassinated? Robert F. Kennedy was assassinted. That is a fact. How do you go from there to mean anything else. << Mary - I think the reason people are drawing conclusions is simply that she brought up RFK's assassination in response to a question about staying in the race or not. Yes, it's a fact, but what does it have to do with that question? Why is the RFK assassination relevant to the issue of whether or not Hillary should stay in the race? The only connection I can see is the fact that the assassination may have helped determine who the nominee was in that year. If there is no connection, and I am just judging Hillary harshly by finding that one, then why did she even mention it? - Allen