Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (386155)	5/24/2008 2:18:54 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576819

Last week, Steve Emerson, probably the most informed terrorism analyst on the planet, said on TV words to the effect of -- "After the first WTC attack, I was told by well-informed terrorism specialists, "they didn't kill enough people for the public to 'get it'". Now, the same people are saying, "It is going to take another 9/11". The idea of a nuclear attack cannot be correct because Z and others on this thread have told us 9/11 was a "lucky hit" and they could never pull it off again, let alone a nuclear strike. Of course, it brings up the question of why in hell is the current administration, who apparently would have more knowledge of the subject than Z and the others on this thread, takes the threat seriously. And even their own false god (Obama) seems to take it seriously (although, he obviously can negotiate the threat away by sitting down with bin Laden). CJ has informed us that there are no suitcase nukes that are unaccounted for, and how he knows that, we haven't any idea. The Left doesn't get it at all, and frankly, the vast majority of other Americans don't have a clue, either. This is not merely a protracted war. This is an existential struggle for non-Muslims.