SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Real Man who wrote (7723)5/24/2008 5:26:03 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71454
 
i do NOT care how propular Astrological Based TA is, it still is rubbish.
As T.Jefferson said to the the question "What do you think people will believe?' Replied "The question should be what will peopleNOT believe"
Jefferson was quite a cynic, really.
So people believe in Astrological TA, that is no surprise.
But it remains hogwash.
As for Elliot Wave, i have no strong view, one way or another.
i would have study this charge about Gann but i would NOT be surprised it is true(from your link) <<The accuracy of his forecasts is still the subject of substantial debate. Gann's son alleged that many of Gann's claims were fraudulent>> Just another con. Max



To: Real Man who wrote (7723)5/24/2008 5:39:37 PM
From: ggersh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71454
 
Quants win cosistently until the model breaks which is what happened with the current credit crunch.....Remember all the banks and IB's are broke????