Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (386370)	5/25/2008 7:45:59 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575775

I would say Libya was in there somewhere until Bush got them to disarm -- an achievement which is pretty much overlooked by the liberal Bush Bashers.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (386370)	5/25/2008 9:18:52 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575775

"He could have stopped them by military action but you wouldn't want that would you?" BS. he made some vague threats after they took the rods out to be reprocessed. But he wasn't serious. Which is why he later backed down quietly. He wasn't serious about NK. He was intent on fulfilling the neocon dream of invading Iraq. If it allowed NK to get nukes, so what? "In fact, you would oppose any use of force to stop Iran wouldn't you?" Not true. But they would have to get a lot further along before I'd support such action. The vague possibility they might develop them sometime in the future isn't exactly compelling.