SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (386578)5/27/2008 3:36:09 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574122
 
CJ, > And LWR experience in no way, shape or form is useful for the development of nuclear weapons.

If you say so, CJ.

Like Steve said, the possibility that you might be wrong doesn't exist, does it? That's how you can safely ignore the impact of you being wrong, especially if you can blame someone else for the results.

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (386578)5/27/2008 2:23:42 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574122
 
"CJ, you still haven't explained why Clinton hoped North Korea would go away before he had to build the LWRs, "

Beats me. I think that was s dumb position.

Actually, the stupidity of it is nothing short of amazing, and it is astonishing that any president would have entered into an agreement on this basis.

It amounts to a crapshoot on the world's nuclear future.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News