Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (386701)	5/27/2008 1:53:27 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 1575765

burma would have attacked american forces. One could make the case that a united, united nations could have gotten its way. Think thats what he meant.

To: bentway who wrote (386701)	5/27/2008 2:24:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575765

Chris, ideally I'd like to see the UN go in with humanitarian aid escorted by an international peacekeeping force led by America. France has the right idea for once: news.yahoo.com The only problem is that China and Russia have vetoed UN resolutions in the past concerning Myanmar. Their excuse is that the junta isn't destabilizing international security, so why bother? Now that the cyclone has come and gone, I don't think it's quite so easy for China and Russia to be as callous. Unless they can make the argument that the citizens of Myanmar should be allowed to simply die of disease and starvation, they should at least support France's resolution. Tenchusatsu