SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (387109)5/28/2008 11:58:32 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572689
 
Yup. But I have never done the equivalent of going to my clients and asking if they had anything to do with the outing of Plame, and they told me "who, me? No way!". Then, after committing myself to that, it turns out that they were telling a grand jury something different to save their own asses.

I don't know about Plame and Rove. I've seen nothing to indicate there was any wrongdoing there. And I certainly don't know the inner workings -- but I surely wouldn't accept McClellan's view of the matter as gospel.

The point is that it wasn't McClellan's call to make. At all. When you take that job it comes with strings attached, and one of those strings is that you cannot always be as candid as YOU might think you should be; you can't always disclose things that YOU think should be disclosed.

If you hire an attorney, a CPA, a physician, or any professional, you have a reasonable expectation of confidence (in these cases, the expectation is actually contractual, but for other professionals, it may just be implicit). While I've not practiced as a CPA for many years, I think it would be a violation of my responsibility to disclose details of a client's business, even one I had 20 years ago.

It is pretty clear that in this case McClellan sold out for the big payday, and was comfortable in disclosing not only facts, but very loose interpretations of the facts.



To: combjelly who wrote (387109)5/29/2008 12:02:07 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572689
 
Seems the deal-breaker for McClellan was Plame/Libby trial, when he had undeniable, unspinable facts that proved he'd been sent out to face the press, all of America, and lie.

What do you say after that? He knew that the entire press corps and America knew he'd been lying too. That was when he resigned.