SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (69273)5/30/2008 5:14:11 AM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 543332
 
1. "Bob, first, even supporters of ANWR admit that it would take between 10 and 20 years before any oil from there would be commercially available to consumers. "

If there was no Bill Clinton veto in 1995 the time would be now.

2. "And even after it starts flowing, it isn't that big a field. "

A million bbl per day is not a big field = please.

3. "Of course, what would likely happen is that, once the nationally owned lands are opened, oil people will then press to open more. And more. And keep on drilling wherever they think there is a field."

Yeah - that is the idea.



To: Sam who wrote (69273)5/30/2008 7:44:32 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 543332
 
I think fossil fuels themselves are the problem.

Say what? They are our life blood and will continue to be for a long time. We can mitigate their negative effects, but we'd shrivel up and die without them.